New research uses novel approach to study plant mimicry
Research provides the first detailed evidence of leaf shape being matched between an undefended and protected plant species
Ottawa, ON (June 13, 2016)
– Batesian mimicry is a common evolutionary tool where unprotected species imitate harmful or poisonous species to protect themselves from predators. To date, nearly all examples of Batesian mimicry have come from studies on animals. A new study published today in Botany
, provides a compelling example of plant mimicry between two New Zealand plants, Alseuosmia pusilla
(known locally as small toropapa) and Pseudowintera colorata
(commonly known as horopito or as a pepper tree).
is a commonly overlooked shrub that grows beneath the forest canopy. It is often mistaken as the much more abundant P. colorata because of its similarities in leaf size, shape, and pigmentation. Indeed, unless the plants are flowering or fruiting, the only quick way to be sure that a plant really is A. pusilla
is to taste the leaf. A. pusilla
is quite palatable, whereas the leaves of P. colorata
, the chemically-defended plant, have a pungent, hot peppery taste that numbs the tongue when chewed. Since herbivores use leaf shape, size and colour to identify food, it is feasible that a palatable plant species might evolve to resemble an unpalatable species.
It has long been assumed that A. pusilla
might avoid being eaten by insect or avian herbivores by mimicking the unpalatable P. colorata
; until now, however, this assumption has lacked empirical evidence. The study published today provides the first detailed evidence that leaf shape is perfectly matched between an undefended species and a chemically defended unrelated species, a trait consistent with Batesian mimicry. The leaves of A. pusilla
were far more likely to resemble those on neighbouring P. colorata
than those on distant plants. Furthermore, leaf shape changed similarly in both species along an altitudinal gradient. The study, novel in its approach, highlights the value of using quantitative morphometric methods when investigating leaf shape, especially in relation to plant mimicry.
“Given the huge variability of leaf shape, not only between species, but also within a species across a large growing range, we needed to develop a method that could accurately quantify leaf shape within a forest population of the two species; this is an approach that other research on plant mimicry has not attempted” says Karl Yager, a graduate student in the School of Biological Sciences at Victoria University of Wellington. “To do this, we compared the relative positions of 70 ‘landmarks’ around the leaf perimeter for hundreds of leaves. More traditional approaches, such as comparing leaf length, width, and area, are insufficient to resolve subtle shape differences that might be used by a herbivore to identify its food.”
This research represents an important first step in demonstrating Batesian mimicry in vascular plants. It also highlights the importance of using a ‘spatially explicit’ morphometric method to investigate leaf shape, and establishes a framework to measure and compare leaf shape within and between species over a growing range.
The paper, “The significance of shared leaf shape in Alseuosmia pusilla and Pseudowintera colorata
” by Karl Yager, Martin Schaefer, and Kevin Gould was published today in Botany.
Please cite Botany
as the source of this story and include a hyperlink to the research study: dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2016-0049
Rebecca Ross, Manager, Communications, Canadian Science Publishing, firstname.lastname@example.org
About the Journal
Published since 1929, Botany
features comprehensive research articles and notes in all segments of plant sciences, including cell and molecular biology, ecology, mycology and plant-microbe interactions, phycology, physiology and biochemistry, structure and development, genetics, systematics, and phytogeography. It also publishes methods, commentary, and review articles on topics of current interest, contributed by internationally recognized scientists.
Canadian Science Publishing publishes the NRC Research Press suite of journals but is not affiliated with the National Research Council of Canada. Papers published by Canadian Science Publishing are peer-reviewed by experts in their field. The views of the authors in no way reflect the opinions of Canadian Science Publishing. Requests for commentary about the contents of any study should be directed to the authors.